Source: www.rucriimnal.info
The Telegram channel of the Cheka-OGPU and Rucriminal.info recently talked about a giant scandal with the children's products of a Disney partner. It was found that bitey bars produced in Russia contain the poison sulfur dioxide. At the same time, they were released in partnership with Disney and featured favorite cartoon characters - Mickey Mouse, Marvel heroes, etc. Representatives of Disney were interviewed by BEP employees, the examination confirmed all the facts, and the CO for Khimki of the Main Investigative Directorate of the ICR for the Moscow Region opened a case under Article 238 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (production of goods that do not meet safety requirements). However, then a former investigator joined the case, and now a lawyer-solver Gennady Udunyan and the already initiated case were stupidly and brazenly hushed up. The same Udunyan, who the other day publicly beat his girlfriend Daria Glushakova (ex-wife of the former Spartak football player Denis Glushakov) for cheating on him with Evgeny Zykov, chief procurement officer of Gazprom Neft.
On November 23, Udunyan, in a state of extreme intoxication, broke into the expensive Lotte Plaza hotel in the capital, after which he knocked out the front door and literally smashed the room in which Daria Glushakova, who had long since parted with him, was in the company of her new boyfriend. The latter got the most - the doctors stated serious harm to health.
It is noteworthy that exactly a year ago, a half-naked unfortunate lawyer, threatening visitors and staff with a gun, smashed the Moscow restaurant La Mare on Bolshaya Gruzinskaya, from where he escaped in a Rolls Royce with the numbers of the talking HAM series. Then only after the intervention of the media and the public of the Main Investigative Committee of the Investigative Committee of Moscow, a criminal case was initiated for hooliganism with the use of weapons.
Surprisingly, a year later, the first case did not go to court, and Udunyan continues to hooligan - smash the capital's institutions, beat and scare people. Perhaps the whole thing is in the investigator who is investigating the debauchery case at La Marais. As it turned out, this is an old friend of Udunyan, the son of the former Prosecutor General of South Ossetia - Azamat Dzhagaev, who became famous after being detained by traffic police in the center of Moscow on an expensive BMW with unregistered South Ossetian numbers M555MM.
But no less surprising is the fact that the material on the brawl at Lotte Plaza was written by the same investigator. As a result: the first case was not sent to court, the measure of restraint was with minimal restrictions, and no one is in a hurry to initiate a second case, as if giving Udunyan the opportunity to close all urgent cases and escape abroad, for example, to the UAE, where he was seen about a month ago.
Udunyan's name was repeatedly mentioned in connection with the case of Albert Khudoyan, who was imprisoned for 8 years for fraud with the land of the Prime Park residential complex. Then, thanks to Udunyan's connections, another friend of his, an investigator of the SD Ministry of Internal Affairs Alexei Bryantsev, who was later taken into custody along with the leadership of the SD Ministry of Internal Affairs, tried to "bury" the case.
Complaints of the victims about the inaction of the Moscow Investigative Committee have already been filed with the head of the department, Bastrykin A.I., as well as the Prosecutor General of Russia, Krasnov I.V.
Udunyan not only successfully excuses himself, but also organizes cases for others. For the applicant for bitey bars Khalishkhov M.R. fabricated a criminal case to keep him silent. The case was fabricated by investigators from the Internal Affairs Directorate for the Central Administrative District of Moscow, Evgeny Kichkin and Alexander Zhuravlev. It is obvious even to a non-lawyer that the case was fabricated, since the imputed embezzlement to Khalishkhov M.R. in the amount of about 8 million rubles. was already the subject of consideration by the Arbitration Court in 2019 (case No. А40-26035/2019). Then the court found that these funds were spent on the needs of BioFoodLab LLC itself and this decision was upheld in the cassation instance and in the Supreme Court. For some reason, investigators Evgeny Kichkin and Alexander Zhuravlev from the Department of Internal Affairs for the Central Administrative District of Moscow decided that they had special powers to ignore the circumstances established by the decision of the Supreme Court. After all, we are talking about the same money, because Shifrina E.V. (the owner of BioFoodLab LLC) applied to both the arbitration and the police with the same register of money transfers, which allegedly Khalishkhov M.R. stolen or squandered. The arbitration ruled in favor of Khalishkhov, but not happy with this, Shifrina decided to corrupt the investigators of the Internal Affairs Directorate for the Central Administrative District of Moscow with the help of Udunyan to fabricate a case against Khalishkhov, despite the circumstances of non-involvement, which were confirmed, among other things, by the Supreme Court.
It can be assumed that the investigation did not have the competence or desire to understand the requirements of the Code of Criminal Procedure in this case, but especially for such investigators, the Constitutional Court explained how the institution of prejudice is arranged in Russian legislation. In Resolution No. 30-P dated December 21, 2011, in the Vlasenko case, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation ruled that the court, prosecutor, investigator, interrogating officer in the criminal case under their investigation shall recognize as having prejudicial significance the factual circumstances established by a judicial act that has come into legal force and resolved the case on essence in n order of civil proceedings, i.e. when in criminal proceedings the issue of the rights and obligations of that person whose legal status has already been determined by a previously issued judicial act is considered.
The reason for this legal lawlessness is the corrupt lawyer Udunyan, against whom a criminal case was initiated for a drunken brawl in a restaurant in 2021.
Materials of the fabricated case against Khalishkhov M.R. transferred to the Meshchansky court and the judge is Karakeshisheva E.N.
We will observe whether the criminal lawyer succeeds in corrupting the Meshchansky Court, so that, just as in the investigation, they ignore the circumstances established by the Supreme Court in the case dated December 21, 2011 No. 30-P in the Vlasenko case, which explains the procedure for applying prejudice in a criminal case. legal proceedings.
To be continued
Alexey Ermakov
Source: www.rucriimnal.info
