Rucriminal.info continues to publish materials of the “Defense Ministry case” on weekends. Last Sunday, we began to acquaint readers with a copy of the protocol of interrogation of Anatoly Serdyukov, and today we continue. But before that, we would like to recall in general the essence of the main charges in the "case of the Ministry of Defense." Anatoly Serdyukov, now the former Minister of Defense, until June 30, 2011 was also the chairman of the board of directors of Oboronservis OJSC, which, among other things, was engaged in the sale of real estate of the military department. Serdyukov appointed his mistress Yevgeny Vasilyeva as the head of the property relations department of the Ministry of Defense (MO) (we will also publish the case files related to her). She also joined the board of directors of Oboronservis OJSC. It was Vasilyeva who made decisions on the implementation of the largest real estate objects of Moscow Region. After Vasilieva was in a leading position in the Moscow Region, her girlfriend, from the time of the Law Faculty of St. Petersburg State University Ekaterina Smetanova, headed the companies (Expert, Legal Center, Mira), which became authorized agents of Oboronservis for real estate sales in Moscow Region. According to the IC of the Russian Federation, at first budget money was invested in real estate, and then this property was sold at a "cheap price." Rather, little money went to the official owner - the Ministry of Defense - and the new owners resold the property at exorbitant prices.
And Anatoly Serdyukov was completely removed from the theft cases even earlier, in 2014. He was only one episode, and he quickly covered up. As for the theft of 3.5 billion, they considered that Vasilyeva misled her boss Serdyukov. The bride cheated on her future husband.
Vasilyeva herself was convicted of part of the thefts, but so that she almost did not sit. And the case of the bulk of the theft secretly written off to the archive.
And now let's move on to the unforgettable answers of Anatoly Serdyukov to the questions of investigators published by Rucriminal.info.
Question from the investigator: Is your signature on the minutes of the meeting of the board of directors of OJSC Krasnaya Zvezda dated March 20, 2012? (the original minutes of the meeting of the board of directors of Krasnaya Zvezda OJSC are presented to witness A. Serdyukov)
Answer of the witness A. Serdyukov: I got acquainted with the document presented to me, I understand its essence and content. The signature at the end of the specified document is similar to mine. Moreover, these documents were registered.
Question from the investigator: Why was the specified transaction agreed only on March 20, 2011, while the lease agreement for the Factory premises with 000 StroyAlliance was concluded on September 30, 2010?
Answer by witness Serdyukov A.E .: I can’t explain.
Question from the investigator: Did you know that the premises of the factory are being leased to StroyAlliance LLC, whose sole founder was the son of Dynkova N.N., citizen Dynkov N.N.?
Answer of witness Serdyukov A.E .: No, I didn’t. Nobody told me about this.
Question from the investigator: Did you know the real value of the rental rate of the premises of JSC 439 CEVKF that were leased?
Answer of witness Serdyukov A.E .: No, I didn’t.
Question from the investigator: Did you know that between October 25, 2010 and July 18, 2012 StroyAlliance LLC received income from the rental of property owned by OJSC 439 CEVKF in the amount of 34,134,761 rubles 88 kopecks , while the Factory itself transferred only 22 556 223 rubles 94 kopecks on a rental account, thereby causing particularly large damage in the amount of 11 578 to the owner of the said property of OJSC 439 CEVKF and the shareholders of the Factory of the Russian Federation and OJSC Krasnaya Zvezda 537 rubles 94 kopecks?
Answer of the witness Serdyukov A.E .: No, I didn’t.
Question from the investigator: Have you received any monetary compensation for signing the indicated documents on the lease of premises of OJSC 439 CEVKF?
The answer of the witness Serdyukov A.E .: No.
To be continued