According to the source of the VChK-OGPU telegram channel, in the near future the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation may initiate a case under Article 210.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (the highest position in the criminal world) against thief in law Vladimir Tyurin (Tyurik). To this may be added the case under article 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (theft by fraud). The latest investigation is connected with the fact that the opera singer, ex-State Duma deputy Maria Maksakova is trying to return the office in the center of Moscow that was actually stolen from her by her ex-husband, Vladimir Tyurin.

In 2018, when Maksakova came to the conclusion that Tyurik was not involved in the murder of her husband, ex-deputy Denis Voronenkov, she resumed communication with Tyurin (they have two children in common).

The mediator was lawyer Alexander Vershinin, who is now accused of divorcing Vasily Khristoforov (thief in law Vasya Voskres) for $ 300,000 for not being prosecuted under a profile article of the Criminal Code on the highest position in the criminal world.

By the way, Vershinin used to be Maksakova's assistant in the State Duma, that is, he had a limit of trust.

Tyurik offered the singer to sell him 75% in ILM AG JSC (inheritance after the death of Maksakova's father), which owned an office with an area of ​​950 square meters in 9/2 Podkopaevsky Lane. The share was estimated at 1,000,000 euros. Under the contract of 17.527 euros.

The deal was drawn up by lawyer Vershinin, for which he flew to Riga, where Maksakova was giving a concert.

Alexander Vershinin is now getting acquainted with the materials about the fraud against the thief in law Vasily Khristoforov (Vasya Voskres).

According to sources, in the near future, Igor Frolov, the former deputy head of the 8th department of the Directorate of the FSB of the Russian Federation, who is accused of fraud against thief in law Dmitry Chanturia (aka Miro Amadyan, aka Mironchik ). He was arrested in February 2020. Frolov was also well acquainted with Tyurik. The acquaintance took place under the following circumstances.

 In 2010, Frolov personally took part in the detention of Tyurik in Moscow. The thief was deprived of his Russian citizenship and sent to a pre-trial detention center for extradition to Spain, where he was wanted for money laundering. Tyurik managed to get out of this hopeless situation for two reasons. Firstly, all his connections were connected by his then wife Maria Maksakova. Secondly, Tyurin in the pre-trial detention center has established relations with the employees of Department K, including Frolov. The latter played a significant role in preventing the extradition from taking place. After Tyurik left the pre-trial detention center, the relationship between the thief in law and Frolov continued. Until the arrest of Frolov, they could be met together in restaurants located in the WTC.

According to sources, Frolov met twice with thief in law # 1 Aslan Usoyan (Ded Khasan). Frolov in Department K oversaw all the work in the area of ​​organized crime. However, Usoyan and Frolov did not find a common language. Grandpa Khasan did not hide that he was not interested in Frolov, his level of communication with the FSB was generals. (Which it was). As a result, Igor Frolov had to be content with tight work with the nephew of Ded Khasan, the "thief in law" Dmitry Chanturia.

Вор в законе Аслан Усоян (Дед Хасан)

Since 2010, Frolov, for a very large fee, began to actually perform the functions of Miron's security guard. He also worked closely with thieves in law Roland Gegechkori (Shlyapa), Vladimir Zhurakovsky (Vova Pukhly). When Ded Khasan was killed by a sniper in 2013, Frolov took an active part in the fight against the enemies of the clan. The list for the landing was given to him by Mironchik. So, on his go-ahead, thief in law Dzhemal Mikeladze (Dzhemo) was arrested. It was assumed that Dzhemo was involved in the elimination of Ded Khasan. Frolov, already as the sole head of the security service Mironchik, organized the arrests of thieves in law Eduard Asatryan (Osetrina Sr.) and Sergei Asatryan (Osetrina Jr.) by the forces of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation. They had a conflict with Chanturia.

Вор в законе Дмитрия Чантурия (Мирончик)

“Thief in law” Dmitry Chanturia (aka Miro Amadyan, aka Mironchik) for a long time only the GUUR of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation paid a standard fee for “thieves” of his level - 100 thousand dollars a month. For this money, Mironchik was guaranteed safety through the GUUR. All work with the GUUR was organized by the security officer of Chanturia, ex-deputy head of the 8th department of the Directorate of the FSB of the Russian Federation, Igor Frolov. The money, among other things, went to the deputy head of the GUUR department, Yevgeny Kuzin. After the introduction in the Russian Federation of the article of the Criminal Code for leadership in a criminal community (Article 210.1), most of the rich "thieves in law" left Russia. The circle of those who are not imprisoned, who are in the Russian Federation, and from whom the security forces can pull large sums, has narrowed extremely.

Сотрудник ГУУР МВД РФ Евгений Кузин в момент ареста

Chanturia became one of the main "cash cows". As a result, in addition to the standard $ 100 thousand a month for the GUM, Mironchik began to come up with additional payments for this department. Chanturia understood that Frolov and Kuzin were bred him, but he paid. And then they reported that they had given the go-ahead for the detention of Chanturia under article 210.1 of the Criminal Code. To prevent this from happening, you need to bring as much as $ 1 million. Mironchik thought about it and acted quite wisely. He decided to get rid of the costly Frolov and Kuzin. Secondly, to get an indulgence from landing under article of the Criminal Code 210.1. Who will send the “thief in law” to prison, who handed over his “roof” and helped to plant it? Moreover, Chanturia received the right to state protection. Thus, the thief in law became a victim and an applicant.

To be continued

Timofey Grishin