Source: www.rucriminal.info
No sooner had the trace of the publication of the telegram channel of the Cheka-OGPU on the topic “investigation of the facts of embezzlement of funds” in one of the investigative departments of the investigative department of the Investigative Committee of Russia for the Yaroslavl region cooled down, when this department discovered another fact of the loss of the material of the check and the funds attached to him. Only this fact, which is called "with a smell."
As Rucriminal.info found out, on 06/01/2015, in the book of registration of reports of crimes (KRSP) of the second department for the investigation of especially important cases of the Department of the Investigative Committee of Russia in the Yaroslavl Region, the material of the check No. to an employee of the traffic police of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for the Yaroslavl Region G. in the amount of 10,000 rubles.
After a comprehensive procedural check on 07/01/2015 by an investigator who had long since retired from the bodies of the Investigative Committee, a decision was made on the basis of the material to refuse to initiate a criminal case under paragraph 2 of part 1 of Art. 24 Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation.
According to available information, in December 2015, the investigative department of the Investigative Committee of Russia in the Yaroslavl region moved from the old building to the building in which it is now located. It must be understood that a lot of things were lost during the move.
According to the information available to Rucrimial.info, in 2016, responding to a request from the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs for the Yaroslavl Region on material No. The Yaroslavl Region sent information that the money in the amount of 10,000 rubles was attached to the specified verification material and would not be returned.
It must be said that such an "attachment" of money is a direct and gross violation of the Instructions on the procedure for the seizure, accounting, storage and transfer of material evidence, valuables and other property in criminal cases in the investigative committee of the Russian Federation (order No. 142 of 09/20/2011), since funds must be handed over for storage to the Bank through the FEO management and does not indicate the presence of the material itself “in kind” already at that time.
In February 2019, Sobolev A.M. was appointed head of the investigative department for the Yaroslavl region, who receives materials from inspections, criminal cases, material and technical values, material evidence, etc. from the previous head of this department.
At the beginning of September 2019, acting the head of the second department for the investigation of particularly important cases becomes the protege of the head of the department Tsaturyan A.V., who after a short time is appointed head of this department and also receives criminal cases, inspection materials, material evidence, etc. by acts.
According to the available information about the loss of material No. 203-54pr-2015 and the money of the head of the department, the second department and forensic science, it became known back in the spring of 2020, and their search has not been successful. Repeated searches for material and money took place in 2022, but were also unsuccessful. Why did the officials of the Investigative Committee of the Investigative Committee of Russia for the Yaroslavl Region conceal the fact of the disappearance of material and money and registered a report on the loss of material only in June 2022.
As our sources rightly believe, the reason for the subsequent actions of the management of the department was a many-sided goal: a direct instruction from the head of the department to “clean up the tails” in connection with the upcoming transfer of cases and materials, things. docks, etc., associated with the long-awaited appointment to the position of the first deputy head of the SEC of the IC of Russia; elimination through the initiation of cases or carrying out checks on the facts of the loss of money, materials, criminal cases of former employees who dared to spoil his reputation as a leader by filing lawsuits against the investigative department and, as he voiced by the leader himself, by publishing in the media about winning civil disputes and about the true the state of affairs in the management of the Yaroslavl region (and it does not matter to him who exactly published the messages in the media, the perpetrators have already been identified); “whitewashing” in this way their reputation and the reputation of their team.
In this regard, around April 2022, a multi-move is played. The head of the department instructs, in the presence of obvious signs of a crime, the newly adopted loyal deputy head of the second department of forensic science V.N. Khodunov, to conduct an internal check on the fact of the disappearance of material No. Indeed, why register a report on the discovery of signs of a crime?!
As previously reported by the Cheka-OGPU, in the material dated 06/28/2022, the irony is that Khodunov V.N. he was the head of the investigative department for the Kirovsky district of Yaroslavl, from where in 2020 an unidentified person “stole money” in the amount of more than 150,000 rubles. in criminal case No. 121027…… 07 and, in addition, it is also directly related to the criminal case No. 121027…..013 about the “theft” from the same department in 2020 of either material, or a criminal case and money (there is no exact information).
The result of an internal audit Khodunov V.N. becomes a report of one of the employees of the second department for the investigation of especially important cases on the discovery of signs of crimes under Part 3 of Art. 160, part 1 of Art. 285 and part 1 of Art. 293 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, that is, on the fact of the loss of material No. 203-54pr-2015 and money on it. The report is registered with the KRSP under No. 84pr-2022 dated 06/23/2022, the verification is entrusted to the newly appointed deputy head of the same department.
Interestingly, does the CA of the IC of Russia know about the registration of this material and is Order No. 76 of 05/04/2011 "On the procedure for submitting special reports and other information about crimes and emergencies in the system of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation"?
According to the source of Rucriminal.info, Tsaturyan A.V. and Khodunov V.N. are generally characterized by colleagues extremely negatively. These comrades are constantly looking for compromising evidence on their own colleagues, who do not shy away from climbing into the offices and safes of subordinate employees in their absence (there are keys), in order to search for any, even personal documents, for subsequent “delivery” reports of all kinds of violations and crimes. By the way, in November-December 2019, one such report by Tsaturyan A.V. in relation to an employee subordinate to him, after checking in the Central Administration of the Investigative Committee of Russia, he was deregistered in the KRSP of the investigative department of the TFR in the Yaroslavl region.
However, on June 28, 2022, that is, 5 days after the registration of report No. 84pr-2022 on the fact of the loss of material No. 203-54pr-2015 and the money attached to it, a publication of the Cheka-OGPU is published, which tells about a similar fact, and , apparently, destroys the above goal of Sobolev A.M. and his team, exposing the mass nature of cases of “theft and loss” of materials, criminal cases and funds in the investigative department in the Yaroslavl region in 2020 and 2022.
Again, a question arises for the employees of the prosecutor's office of the Yaroslavl region, who, on duty, must check the accounting and registration discipline, including in the department of the Investigative Committee of Russia in the Yaroslavl region. And how was this very discipline tested in the Investigative Committee of the TFR in the Yaroslavl Region? And why has the material No. 84pr-2022 not yet been withdrawn and transferred to the CA of the Russian Investigative Committee? On what basis is a procedural check in relation to employees of the TFR department in the Yaroslavl region carried out by an employee of the same department from where the material and money disappeared?
That is, it turns out that after concealing an malfeasance in criminal case No. 121027 ... .007 under Part 1 of Art. 158 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation on the fact of "theft" of more than 150,000 rubles. from the investigative department for the Kirovsky district of Yaroslavl, which was first reported by the Cheka-OGPU, and an official offense in criminal case No. 121027 ... 013 on the fact of committing an almost similar crime in the same department, the prosecutor's office of the Yaroslavl region continues to do exactly the same thing, openly disregarding the requirements of the Federal Law "On the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation", all kinds of orders of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation and simply withdrawing from any supervision over the administration of the TFR in the Yaroslavl region.
And here, including in connection with the obvious intersection with the story published by the Cheka-OGPU on June 28, 2022, a number of serious questions arise. For example, why the money attached to the material No. 203-54pr-2015, in violation of the Instructions from 07/15/2015, was not handed over for storage to the FEO, bank, camera of material docks? Where was the material from 07/01/2015? When exactly did the material and money disappear? Why, at the time of acceptance of this material in February 2019, in January 2020, its loss and the loss of money attached to it were not detected? Why was material No. 84pr-2022 registered only on 06/23/2022 if the loss of material and money was known at the beginning of 2020, and possibly even earlier? Isn't this registration connected with a flood of publications in the media, telegram channels about the true state of affairs in the investigative department in the Yaroslavl region, about the role of the head of the department and his team in this and other facts? Why the material was handed over to the employee, subordinate in service to Tsaturyan A.V. and Sobolev A.M.? To what extent is he not interested in making the right decision? How legal will the materials he collected and the final decision be? Will an administrative resource be applied? Is the registration of material No. 84pr-2022 an attempt to hide the multiple facts of the loss of money, materials, criminal cases in the administration of the Yaroslavl region in order to obtain the coveted appointment, a means of settling accounts with former employees and saving "one's" reputations? What kind of lawlessness is going on in the investigative department of the Investigative Committee of Russia in the Yaroslavl region, and why is the prosecutor's office and the CA of the Investigative Committee of Russia inactive?
We believe that after this publication, the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation, the Central Administration of the Investigative Committee of Russia and the Prosecutor's Office of the Yaroslavl Region will have similar questions regarding the activities of Sobolev A.M. and his teams. Moreover, according to our information, various signals, including anonymous ones, were received in the Central Administration of the Investigative Committee of Russia about the disastrous state of affairs in the Investigative Committee of the Investigative Committee of Russia in the Yaroslavl Region, which stupidly descend to the head of the Yaroslavl administration, "they died there," but fomented a "witch hunt."
It is very interesting how the head and his team will explain the massive facts of the loss of money, materials and cases in the investigative department for the Kirovsky district and in the administration for the Yaroslavl region in 2020, the initiation of criminal cases based on these facts under Art. 158 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, attempts to hide these facts and possible malfeasance.
Timofey Grishin
To be continued
Source: www.rucriminal.info
