Source: www.rucriminal.info
And again, the events in the Shchyolkovsky District of the Moscow Region are in the spotlight.
Let us recall that at the beginning of this year, the Shchyolkovsky District thundered throughout the country in connection with the events related to the theft of funds in the amount of about 100,000,000 rubles from the developer of the territories of the Shchyolkovsky Municipal District, OOO "Specialized Developer Group of Companies SU 22", when the general director and chief accountant of the company, accused of theft, could avoid criminal liability through an unprecedentedly illegal decision of the Shchyolkovsky City Prosecutor, who dropped the charge of committing theft.
The criminal case was terminated by the Shchyolkovsky City Court due to the expiration of the statute of limitations for criminal liability under Article 330 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (arbitrariness). A higher court overturned the illegal court ruling and sent the case for a new trial. And while the court was reopening the case, the Investigative Committee for the Shchyolkovsky District intervened in the situation. And it intervened so loudly that it could be heard beyond the district. On June 11, 2024, at six in the morning, masked men with machine guns burst into the house where the widow of the former owner of the company, a 71-year-old woman who inherited the company after her husband's death, lived, took away the elderly woman's phone with a blood sugar monitoring program installed, searched the house, seized documents and smartphones, took her and her daughter to the building of the Investigative Committee, where they kept her in thirty-degree heat until 15:00 and only then began interrogating her.
From the questions asked, it became clear that the Shchyolkovsky District Administration and the Losino-Petrovsky Urban District Administration have claims against the pensioner, and no more, no less, for an amount of about 2 billion rubles, for allegedly uncompleted work on the construction of social infrastructure facilities and the refusal of a land plot on which it was planned to build a school for 1,200 students.
At the same time, the development agreement did not provide for the financial participation of the administration at all. The investigation was presented with the decisions of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow Region from 2021 and 2023, issued on the claims of the Losino-Petrovsky Urban District Administration, which clearly state that the developer is not at fault for failing to fulfill the terms of the agreement, the administration created obstacles to construction, did not perform land surveying, which led to the refusal to issue a building permit, without which any construction work would be illegal.
Also, the investigation "did not pay" attention to the fact that the company refused the land plot only after its activities were effectively suspended by the administration, and this land plot became the property of the Losino-Petrovsky urban district! But, apparently, the court decisions that established these circumstances are no guide for the Shchyolkovo investigative department, which not only nearly brought the entrepreneur's widow to her grave by treating the 71-year-old pensioner like a hardened criminal, but also, ignoring the law (and court decisions that have entered into legal force have the force of law), arrested all the property of the widow, members of her family, seized primary documentation and accounting programs from the company OOO "UMiAT SU 22", headed by her daughter, completely paralyzing the work of this company.
And here is the culmination of these events! It turns out that the agreement with the Administration on behalf of the developer company was concluded by none other than the former CEO of the company, Mr. Semenov, who is currently in the status of an accused in the Shchyolkovo court. And the actions to block the work of the developer company began to be carried out by the administration right after the scandalous dismissal of the embezzling CEO. And the criminal case was initiated after the Administration lost again in the Arbitration Court, which, by the way, refused to seize the property of the developer company.
The situation regarding the heir of the construction company has been brought to the point of absurdity. On the one hand, there are court decisions that have entered into legal force, documents from which the rightness of the developer company is clearly traced, on the other hand, revenge and the desire to evade justice in any possible way by the former CEO, who is in close contact with the administration and, apparently, the biased Investigative Committee for the city of Shchyolkovo.
Source: www.rucriminal.info
